<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid City goes PDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monolithllc.com/rapidcity/2009/12/rapid-city-goes-pdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monolithllc.com/rapidcity/2009/12/rapid-city-goes-pdf/</link>
	<description>Tracking &#34;Rapid City&#34;, My Monthly Superhero Comic Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://monolithllc.com/rapidcity/2009/12/rapid-city-goes-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monolithllc.com/rapidcity/?p=413#comment-45</guid>
		<description>On the one hand, I do like having all the &quot;guts&quot; out there on display.... But on the other hand, I prefer the more streamlined appearance of the PDF scripts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Celtx does offer a PDF export, but for the comics format it is just awful. For some reason it changes into a thing that looks more like an Excel spreadsheet than a script. It could be functionally used, as all of the information is actually there, but it is far uglier than I would ever show off in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, I do like having all the &#8220;guts&#8221; out there on display&#8230;. But on the other hand, I prefer the more streamlined appearance of the PDF scripts.</p>
<p>Celtx does offer a PDF export, but for the comics format it is just awful. For some reason it changes into a thing that looks more like an Excel spreadsheet than a script. It could be functionally used, as all of the information is actually there, but it is far uglier than I would ever show off in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Vaehling</title>
		<link>http://monolithllc.com/rapidcity/2009/12/rapid-city-goes-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Vaehling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monolithllc.com/rapidcity/?p=413#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never used Project Central myself, so the peek you provided was more than interesting. The catalog and index card functions look intriguing. It could be a great tool. Of course, you don&#039;t need all that to present the scripts. And PDF has two major advantages for me as a reader: I can download and print the scripts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you mean by &quot;series of simple installs&quot;? Doesn&#039;t Celtx offer PDF export anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve never used Project Central myself, so the peek you provided was more than interesting. The catalog and index card functions look intriguing. It could be a great tool. Of course, you don&#39;t need all that to present the scripts. And PDF has two major advantages for me as a reader: I can download and print the scripts. </p>
<p>What do you mean by &#8220;series of simple installs&#8221;? Doesn&#39;t Celtx offer PDF export anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

